Strength Isometric Test: Pull Test – Double Arm

The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] measures how much force a client can produce during an isometric two-arm pulling task against a fixed resistance. It is commonly used to assess bilateral upper-body pulling force in a controlled setup. This can provide useful context for rowing, climbing, grappling, carrying, pulling, contact sport, gym-based pulling tasks, manual work and progress tracking.

The Muscle Meter is used to measure force output during the test. When used on its own, the Muscle Meter primarily measures peak force, which is the highest force value produced during the effort. When used with Measurz, Muscle Meter data can be recorded and analysed with broader strength and force-time metrics, including peak force, impulse, torque, rate of force development, time to peak and fatigue index.

For routine Double Arm Pull testing, peak force is usually the main metric. Force as a percentage of body weight may be useful if directly calculated from the client’s test force and body weight, especially for baseline comparison and retesting. Rate of force development and time to peak may be useful when rapid pulling force matters, such as grappling, climbing, rowing starts, swimming starts, contact sport or explosive pulling tasks. Impulse may be useful if sustained force over a defined time window is intentionally tested. Fatigue index is only relevant if repeated or sustained double-arm pulling contractions are part of the protocol.

The result can support assessment reasoning and progress tracking, but it does not diagnose shoulder pain, elbow pain, grip weakness, back pain, nerve injury, injury risk, sport readiness or work capacity on its own.

What Is the Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter]?

The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] is an isometric force assessment where the client pulls with both arms against the Muscle Meter without visible movement.

The test can be performed in different positions depending on the goal and available setup. Common options include seated row position, standing pull, half-kneeling pull, split-stance pull, prone pull, supine pull or a task-specific pulling position.

Because setup can vary widely, the result should always be interpreted as a protocol-specific score. A seated bilateral row with elbows at 90 degrees is not the same as a standing double-arm pull, a vertical pull, a deadlift-style pull or a sport-specific grappling-style pull.

Consistent setup matters because body position, shoulder angle, elbow angle, grip, handle type, trunk position, strap angle, anchor point, pulling direction and client effort can all affect the result. This test measures force output in a specific pulling setup. It does not fully measure rowing capacity, pull-up capacity, climbing performance, shoulder health, grip endurance, sport performance or movement quality on its own.

Step-by-Step Protocol / Practice

1. Prepare the client

Explain that the test measures how strongly they can pull with both arms into the Muscle Meter in a fixed position.

Record baseline symptoms, shoulder discomfort, elbow symptoms, wrist or hand symptoms, grip discomfort, neck symptoms, back symptoms, fatigue, recent training and confidence with pulling.

Use at least one submaximal practice trial so the client understands the position, effort and direction of force.

2. Set the client position

Choose the position that matches your assessment goal.

Record:

• seated, standing, kneeling, prone, supine or task-specific position
• bilateral handle or two-handle setup
• shoulder angle
• elbow angle
• wrist position
• grip type
• handle or strap type
• trunk position
• stance or lower-limb position
• support used
• anchor height and distance

3. Set up the Muscle Meter

Set the Muscle Meter so it measures the intended pulling force direction.

This may involve a strap, handle, fixed anchor, wall anchor, door anchor, platform anchor or professional-stabilised setup. Record the exact setup, strap angle, anchor point, strap length and whether the setup moved during testing.

4. Place the handle, strap or contact point

Position the handle or strap so the client can pull with both arms without slipping, wrist discomfort or excessive grip limitation.

The contact point should be comfortable and repeatable. Record grip type, handle diameter and whether lifting straps or aids were used.

5. Stabilise the position

Stabilise the trunk and arm position as needed so the effort remains a pull in the intended direction.

Avoid uncontrolled trunk extension, trunk rotation, shoulder shrugging, elbow angle changes, wrist collapse, foot movement or excessive breath holding unless the protocol intentionally includes those features.

6. Give clear instructions

Use consistent instructions such as:

“Take up the slack.”

“Build up smoothly, then pull as hard as you can and hold.”

“Keep your body position still.”

“Pull evenly through both arms.”

“Keep breathing.”

“Do not jerk the start.”

“Tell me if you feel pain, tingling, cramping or anything unusual.”

7. Record trials

Use 1–2 practice trials, then record 2–3 maximal trials.

A common contraction duration is 3–5 seconds.

Rest for 60–120 seconds between high-force trials, or longer if symptoms, cramping or fatigue occur.

Record whether the final score uses the best trial or average of recorded trials.

8. Identify invalid trials

Repeat or mark a trial as invalid if:

• the client changes body position
• the device slips
• the strap or anchor moves
• the grip slips
• the wrists collapse
• the trunk rotates, extends or leans
• the elbow angles change substantially
• the client jerks the start
• pain limits effort
• the force direction changes
• one arm clearly dominates when equal pull is intended

9. Record symptoms

Record shoulder pain, elbow pain, wrist or hand pain, neck discomfort, back discomfort, grip discomfort, paraesthesia, cramping, confidence and apprehension.

For retesting, match the same position, handle or strap setup, force direction, instructions, contraction duration, rest period, scoring method and symptom recording.

Why It Is Used

The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] is used to quantify bilateral pulling force output in a repeatable setup.

It may be useful for:

• baseline upper-body pulling strength assessment
• monitoring change over time
• tracking shoulder-girdle and trunk pulling strength
• assessing bilateral pulling force in sport or gym contexts
• supporting climbing, rowing, swimming, grappling or contact sport assessment
• workplace context where pulling, carrying, bracing or manual tasks are relevant
• comparing pulling strength with pushing strength, grip strength, shoulder ROM or scapular strength
• client education

The test should support assessment reasoning. It should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic, capacity or clearance measure.

What It Measures

The test primarily measures isometric double-arm pulling force in the chosen setup.

It may provide useful information about:

• bilateral upper-body pulling force capacity
• shoulder-girdle force output
• trunk bracing contribution
• grip contribution
• confidence producing pulling force
• pain response during resisted pulling
• change in force over time
• relationship between pulling strength and related functional tasks

It does not directly measure:

• pull-up strength
• rowing performance
• climbing performance
• isolated latissimus dorsi strength
• isolated scapular strength
• grip endurance
• shoulder diagnosis
• work capacity
• sport readiness

Understanding the Result, Reference Values and What to Look For

What a higher or lower result may suggest

A higher score may suggest greater double-arm pulling force output in that specific test setup. A lower score may suggest reduced force output, but the reason should be interpreted carefully.

Lower force may be influenced by pain, apprehension, poor familiarisation, fatigue, grip limitation, shoulder symptoms, elbow symptoms, back symptoms, inconsistent handle position, poor stabilisation, reduced confidence or device movement.

One result should not be interpreted in isolation. Interpretation is strongest when the same setup is repeated over time and reviewed alongside symptoms, confidence, movement quality, related tests and functional goals.

What can influence the result

Important influences include:

• body position
• shoulder angle
• elbow angle
• wrist position
• grip type
• handle diameter
• trunk position
• stance width
• anchor height
• pull direction
• strap length
• device placement
• pain
• fatigue
• familiarisation
• client confidence
• setup stiffness

Normative, reference and comparative values

Published Muscle Meter-specific universal norms for Double Arm Pull testing are limited because the test can be performed in many different positions and force directions.

Because of this, reference values should be used cautiously and only when the test setup, device placement, population and scoring method are closely matched.

For most Measurz use, the most useful comparisons are:

• the client’s own baseline
• change across retests
• force as a percentage of body weight if directly calculated
• pain or symptom response
• confidence during testing
• comparison with related upper-limb and trunk tests
• comparison with single-arm pull results when both are tested

Reference values provide context, not diagnostic, work-clearance or sport-clearance cut-offs.

Practical interpretation priorities

Use this order:

• compare with the client’s own baseline
• compare with previous double-arm pull results using the same setup
• consider symptoms during and after testing
• consider confidence and effort quality
• review whether compensations or grip limitations were present
• compare with single-arm pull testing when relevant
• compare with related strength, mobility or performance tests
• relate the result to sport, gym, work or daily-life demands
• retest under the same conditions to monitor change
• do not use reference values as pass/fail criteria

What to Look at for Each Relevant Muscle Meter Metric

Peak force

Use for maximum double-arm pulling force output, baseline strength, progress tracking and comparing force across retests.

Look for best score or average score, consistent setup, change from baseline, symptom response and compensation during maximal effort.

Force as percentage of body weight

Use only when calculated directly from test force and body weight.

This can be useful for sport and gym contexts where pulling relative to body mass matters. Use it for internal comparison and retesting rather than as a universal target.

Torque

Torque is usually less practical for a general double-arm pull unless the lever arm and biomechanical model are clearly defined.

Use only when the lever arm is measured and a specific interpretation is needed.

Rate of force development

Use when rapid pulling force production matters, such as grappling, contact sport, swimming starts, rowing starts, climbing moves or explosive upper-body tasks.

Look for early force production and whether RFD changes while peak force stays similar.

Time to peak

Use to understand whether force is produced quickly or gradually.

Look for delayed peak force, faster time to peak across retests, and whether a slower time reflects caution, poor cueing, pain or actual performance difference.

Impulse

Use only if a sustained force window is intentionally tested.

Look for whether the client can produce and sustain force over the selected time window.

Fatigue index

Use only if repeated or sustained pulling contractions are part of the protocol.

Look for drop-off across repeated trials and whether fatigue improves across a training block.

Assessing and Providing Context for Different Client Populations

Youth clients

Consider growth, maturation, coordination, attention, hand size, training age and familiarity with pulling tasks. Practice trials are important so the client learns to pull without excessive trunk movement or jerking.

Adults and general fitness clients

Use the test for baseline strength, progress tracking and confidence with pulling force. Compare results with gym goals, grip strength, pull-up capacity and shoulder mobility.

Older adults

Consider shoulder comfort, grip tolerance, fatigue, daily pulling tasks and confidence. A lower score may provide useful context, but it should not be interpreted without functional assessment.

Athletes and sport clients

Consider climbing, grappling, swimming, rowing, contact sport, throwing support tasks and gym pulling demands. Peak force alone does not equal sport performance, but it can support a broader upper-body strength profile.

Workplace and manual task clients

Consider pulling, carrying, gripping, lifting, bracing and manual handling demands. Do not use one strength score to clear work duties.

Clients returning after injury

Use the test to monitor force output, confidence and symptom response over time. Strength alone should not confirm readiness.

Clients with pain or persistent symptoms

Pain, fear, guarding, fatigue, apprehension and confidence may influence force. Record symptoms carefully and compare with related findings.

Higher body mass clients

Absolute force and force relative to body mass may both be useful. Interpret the result in relation to the chosen setup, goals, symptoms and function.

Reliability, Validity and Measurement Considerations

Repeatability improves when the same setup is used each time.

Record and standardise:

• same body position
• same shoulder angle
• same elbow angle
• same wrist position
• same grip type
• same handle or strap
• same trunk position
• same stance
• same anchor height and distance
• same force direction
• same device placement
• same instructions
• same contraction duration
• same rest period
• same scoring method
• same symptom and compensation recording

Recent upper-body isometric push and pull research supports extracting peak force, rate of force development, impulse and time to peak force when the setup is standardised. However, force values are strongly protocol-dependent.

Handheld or portable dynamometry can be reliable when a controlled make-test format and consistent stabilisation are used. Fixed or strap-stabilised setups can improve consistency where available.

Common Errors and Limitations

Common errors include:

• not defining the exact pull direction
• inconsistent handle or strap setup
• changing shoulder or elbow angle
• allowing trunk extension or rotation
• allowing shoulder shrugging
• allowing grip to slip
• device slipping
• strap or anchor movement
• jerking the start
• one arm dominating unintentionally
• breath holding
• testing through high pain
• comparing different pull protocols directly
• treating the score as a diagnosis or clearance measure

Limitations include:

• testing is setup-dependent
• grip may limit the score
• bilateral testing can hide side-to-side differences
• strap setup requires careful anchor control
• Muscle Meter-specific universal norms may be limited
• pain, fear or guarding can reduce force output
• peak force does not measure endurance or movement quality
• pulling force does not automatically predict pull-up, rowing, climbing, sport or work performance
• the test does not determine sport or work readiness on its own

Practical Applications

The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] may be useful for:

• establishing a baseline
• tracking bilateral pulling strength over time
• reviewing force relative to body weight if directly calculated
• monitoring response to exercise or intervention
• supporting upper-limb and trunk strength profiling
• comparing with grip strength, shoulder strength, push testing and pull-up capacity
• comparing with single-arm pull results when appropriate
• educating the client about measurable progress
• reviewing sport, gym, work or daily-life demands

Ideas to Make the Result Better

If force is low, consider assessing grip strength, shoulder ROM, scapular strength, pulling technique, upper-limb strength, trunk control, fatigue and confidence with loading.

If bilateral force is good but one side appears limited during tasks, compare with single-arm pull testing and side-to-side shoulder or grip measures.

If grip limits the result, record it clearly and consider whether grip testing or a strap-assisted version is more relevant to the testing goal.

If pain limits the result, record the pain response and review whether the test position, handle, pressure point or effort level needs modification.

If force is good but function is limited, compare with pulling endurance, rowing capacity, shoulder control, grip, trunk control and sport or work demands.

Recommended Standard Protocol Summary

Position: Standardised seated, standing, kneeling, supine, prone or task-specific double-arm pull position
Start position: Shoulder, elbow, wrist, trunk and stance position recorded
Joint or trunk angle: Record shoulder angle, elbow angle, wrist position and trunk position
Trials: 1–2 practice trials, then 2–3 recorded trials
Contraction duration: 3–5 seconds
Rest: 60–120 seconds between high-force efforts
Metric: Peak force, plus percentage of body weight only if directly calculated
Attachment or device setup: Muscle Meter aligned with intended pulling direction through fixed strap, handle, anchor or stabilised setup
Final score: Best trial or average of trials
Key retesting requirement: Same position, handle setup, force direction, instructions, contraction duration, rest and scoring method

FAQs

What does the Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] measure?

It measures isometric pulling force output from both arms in a specific setup.

Is it the same as a pull-up or row test?

No. It measures force against a fixed resistance. Pull-ups and rows involve movement, bodyweight, technique and endurance demands.

Should the result be recorded as percentage of body weight?

It can be if calculated directly from test force and body weight. This may be useful for bodyweight pulling contexts, but it should mainly be used for baseline and retest comparison.

Are there universal Double Arm Pull Muscle Meter norms?

Published universal norms are limited because the test can be performed in many setups. Baseline and retest comparison are usually more useful.

Can this test show side-to-side difference?

Not by itself. Double-arm testing can hide asymmetry. Use the Single Arm Pull Test if side-to-side comparison is needed.

Can this test determine sport or work readiness?

No. It can contribute to a broader test battery, but it should not be used alone to determine readiness.

What can make the result unreliable?

Different body position, force direction, handle setup, anchor position, grip, fatigue, pain, compensation and inconsistent instructions can affect results.

What should be recorded in Measurz?

Record body position, handle or strap setup, force direction, peak force, percentage of body weight if directly calculated, symptoms, compensations, scoring method and retest conditions.

Key Takeaways

• The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] measures bilateral isometric pulling force.
• Peak force is usually the main routine Muscle Meter metric.
• The exact setup must be recorded because pull-test results are highly protocol-specific.
• Percentage of body weight should only be used when calculated directly from force and body weight.
• Double-arm testing can hide side-to-side differences, so single-arm testing may be needed for asymmetry.
• Measurz should capture setup, symptoms, bodyweight-normalised values where directly calculated, compensations and retesting conditions.

References

Aerts, F., Sheets, H., & colleagues. (2025). Reliability and agreement of hand-held dynamometry using three standard rater test positions. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 20(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.128286

Bohannon, R. W. (1986). Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Physical Therapy, 66(2), 206–209.

Curovic, M., Baltezarević, D., & colleagues. (2026). Intraday and interday reliability of horizontal upper body push and pull tests. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/applsci16010026

Moraux, A., Canal, A., Ollivier, G., Ledoux, I., Doppler, V., Payan, C., & Hogrel, J.-Y. (2023). Psychometric properties of a standardized protocol of muscle strength assessment by hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24, 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06400-2